POBNEWS24 Dhaka, June 16, 2026 : US Ambassador to Bangladesh Brent T. Christensen visited the centennial Bangladesh Police Academy in Sardah, Rajshahi, on Monday. But considering the current political reality of Bangladesh, the increased US involvement during the interim Yunus government, and Washington’s long-standing interest in the law and order and security sector, the visit raises new questions.
The US embassy said in a press note that the ambassador’s visit to Sardah celebrated the long tradition of cooperation between US and Bangladeshi law enforcement agencies. But the question is, why now? Why the police academy? And why at a time when Washington’s interest in Bangladesh’s security, elections, immigration, and regional geopolitics is greater than ever? Why is the police academy important?
The Bangladesh Police Academy in Sardah is not just a training institution. Established in 1912, this institution is the main center for developing police leadership in the country. Most of the high-ranking officers of the Bangladesh Police receive their training from here. As a result, the presence of a foreign ambassador here, while symbolic, cannot be denied its strategic importance.
According to experts, strengthening relations with the police and internal security structures, in addition to the military, is currently an important part of the US global security strategy.
Is the US goal just training?
In a recent meeting with the Bangladesh government, Ambassador Christensen publicly stated that the US has trained about 30,000 Bangladeshi police officers and provided various equipment assistance since 2010. In the same meeting, he also emphasized the rapid implementation of the (SPEAR) and (ENV) programs.
The (SPEAR) program is mainly related to strengthening the security of the US embassy and diplomatic areas in Dhaka. On the other hand, (ENV) is related to the Electronic Nationality Verification immigration and identity verification system. In other words, the US is not only seeking training, but also deeper involvement in security information, identity verification and security infrastructure.
A question is circulating on social media and in political circles – is the Saradha visit a continuation of the agreements and security cooperation that were discussed with the United States during the interim Yunus government?
There is no public document in this regard that directly proves this visit as the implementation of any new agreement. However, the reality is that Dhaka-Washington contacts on security, immigration, trade, infrastructure and strategic cooperation have increased significantly in the past year. Many believe that this is a continuation of the agreements during the Yunus government?
As a result, according to many analysts, the Saradha visit should not be seen as an isolated incident, but as part of a larger security cooperation framework.
What if it was done by the Indian ambassador? A section of political observers argue that if the same visit was done by the Indian ambassador, there would have been a huge controversy in the political arena of Bangladesh.
There are two reasons for this.
First, anti-India political rhetoric has been active in Bangladesh for a long time. As a result, any security-related involvement of India easily turns into a political controversy.
Second, the United States is often presented as a development, training, and international cooperation partner in Bangladesh; but India is often directly implicated in the discussion of exerting political influence.
Therefore, the difference in response is not only due to the incident; but also the result of the prevailing political perception surrounding the respective states.
Christensen expressed concerns about Chinese influence, military cooperation, and China’s presence in critical infrastructure in Bangladesh in a US Senate hearing. He also spoke of close contact with Bangladesh’s political and security leadership.
In this context, many see the Saradha visit as part of a larger geopolitical competition.
Bangladesh has currently become the center of equal interest for the United States, India, and China due to the Bay of Bengal, regional trade routes, maritime security, and Indo-Pacific strategy.
Where is the main secret?
The real secret is probably not in the visible part of the visit, but in the invisible part.
The ambassador has gone to Saradha—this is the news. But why did he go at this time, who did he meet with, what is the future framework of security cooperation, how far the implementation of SPEAR and ENV has progressed, and what the next US goals are in Bangladesh’s security sector – the answers to these questions have not yet been fully revealed. According to Bangladeshi political analysts, at first glance, this may seem like a normal diplomatic activity. According to analysts, there is sufficient basis to interpret the Saradha Police Academy tour as a visible message of the US’s long-term security engagement, increasing its strategic presence, and deepening ties with Bangladesh’s internal security structure.





